James Kovacs
Fall 2001, Biology Senior Seminar
Goshen College, Goshen IN, 46526
Thesis:With
the advent of antibiotics in 1929 Fleming said, "The time may come when
penicillin can be bought by anyone in the shops.Then
there is the danger that the ignorant man may easily underdose himself
and by exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the drug make
them resistant."With the overuse
of antibiotics today we have seen this very idea come to be.Over
usage is caused most prevalently by a lack of education on the part of
the patient.Thus stated, the way
to overcome such a circumstance is to educate, not only the patient but
also the physician.
II.History – Present (Statistics)
b.Current Over Prescription Rates
IV.Reasons for wanting to stop overuse
a.Drug Resistant Strains Developing
b.Extensive Cost for fighting Resistant Strains
V.Solutions for Controlling Overuse
Many
causes can be blamed for the overuse of antibiotics.Mostly
the blame can be put on the consumer or patient and their overall lack
of education.This is more than just
a higher level of learning this would an education that is specific to
the needs of prescribing and the overall use of antibiotics.This
cause, though the most prevalent, is not the only cause.Diagnostic
uncertainty, patient expectations, and malpractice litigation are other
causes that ideally have played into the overuse of antibiotics.
While
most blame can be put onto the patient the physician is also at fault in
some cases.With the demanding scheduling
in a doctor's office, the physician is usually on a time intensive table.He
or she must rush in and out of patient rooms seeing many different types
of symptoms.Thus with a hurried
schedule physicians would rather err on the side of prescribing too much
rather than too little, or even at all.[8]In
the same breath it is said that it is easier and takes less time to prescribe
an antibiotic than it does to tell the patient why you are not prescribing
one.The use of testing devices to
gain knowledge about an illness is the only way in which the correct, if
any, antibiotic is needed.Physicians
tend to skip these defining tests to save time and money in the office.It
is also reported that physicians tend to not perceive the amount of patient
satisfaction in giving antibiotics, meaning that some patients don't really
want the antibiotics.[9]
Insurance
companies could also have the blame pointed in their direction.The
multiple changes and pressures that insurance companies cause doctors to
undergo can be shown to increase the amount of antibiotics that are given.For
instance, an insurance company would gladly pay for a prescription rather
than a follow up visit.Meaning
that the physician feels pressured into giving antibiotics because the
authority that brings him/her patients is holding this proposition over
there head.Thus, the physicians
are more likely to prescribe to appease the insurance company.With
the often changes of a primary provider, perhaps as often as six to twelve
months, the doctor feels that the patient isn't really trusting him/her,
because they are new to seeing the physician, therefore the doctor feels
that he/she must do everything possible to make the patient feel comfortable
and more importantly to gain the trust of the patient.Thus,
the doctor is more likely to over prescribe because he/she wants to convey
to the patient that he/she is competent in treating illnesses.[9]
The
main blame for the over usage of antibiotics is due the lack of education
of the public.The general public
doesn't have a grasp for the difference between that of a virus and a microbial
infection.With this simple bit
of knowledge, much of the overuse would be eliminated, because after all,
antibiotics cannot treat a virus.Patient's
expectations play into what the mindset of the patient is when he/she steps
into the doctor's office.For
instance, say a patient is experiencing symptoms similar to his or her
spouse was feeling a week ago, and the spouse had been treated with an
antibiotic and now is feeling better.Now
the patient goes to the doctor with one item on his/her agenda, to get
that same antibiotic.The doctor
sees the patient and decides that it is a virus, but before the doctor
has time to tell the patient this, the patient goes into the spiel and
his/her spouse felt the same and that the doctor prescribed an antibiotic
and they felt better.So now the
doctor is in a predicament and most likely chooses to just prescribe.This
of course, being a hypothetical example, is most likely played out in a
doctor's office on a daily basis.After
getting and taking this antibiotic the person then feels better after a
week or so, because that is the normal life span of a virus.This
problem is quite evident in a family setting, because both antibiotics
and viruses are shared.Prior experience
plays into the equation most prevalently when it is the previous experience
of that patient.Patients of a lower
income level are also more likely to demand antibiotics for illnesses.[10]Patients
that come from disadvantaged situations are more likely to want a quick
fix, they do not want to know about why they are sick, and all that they
care about is that they want to get better and back to work.
In
a world that is so time and money oriented it is easy to see how patients
want to get in and out of the doctors office, after all time is money.This
not only goes for the work force, but also for the children.Educators
and daycare personnel most often require that student or toddler must have
had antibiotics to be able to continue to be at school or the daycare.[9]Therefore
if the physician does not prescribe an antibiotic than a parent will have
to stay at home with the child until he/she is better.This
causes problems for the parents because of working schedules and cash flow.With
the direction that the world is going these days this problem will only
increase.Larger corporations usually
means less family oriented and therefore fewer sick leaves are allowed,
especially in the case of children.
In
the past the over prescribing of antibiotics for upper respiratory illnesses
(URI) has created a supply and demand system.[11]Early
in the history of antibiotics some properties of the antibiotics and the
microbes that they were being used on were still being discovered.Since
that time many new discoveries and breakthroughs have been made and now
we know much more than when antibiotics were first discovered, or invented.Only
history and the lack of knowledge can be blamed for this, however the reoccurrence
of this now is due to lack of education.
The
need for the reduction or stoppage of antibiotic overuse is made apparent
by the recent increase of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria and
the cost of fighting these "super bugs".This
has also become an issue in the recent past with the advent of the bio-terrorism
using anthrax in postal mailings.In
four recent newspaper articles and one online news headline experts are
warning that with the used of Cipro to treat anthrax we are causing a much
larger problem in risking the loss of a crucial class of antibiotics.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16]
Even with the continuous advent of new and more powerful drugs by breakthrough
medical technologies the bacteria are still finding ways to become resistant.In
a September 7 news report on CNN.com Stenger concluded that "the
United States must spend between $30 billion and $50 billion a year"[17]
to fight these super bugs.With figures
of that magnitude, it is hard not to see that there is a problem.Where
would money like that come from, certainly not from selling the antiquated
antibiotics.
With
a grandiose problem ahead of mankind one would expect a grandiose solution
to remedy the problem.However a
much simpler and down to earth ideal is one that should prevail.Education
is perhaps the strongest tool to influence a group of people, for bad or
good.Giving knowledge in an easy
and foolproof way of interpretation and is among the simplest way of showing
someone the right way in which to carry out a task.So
why not then use the simple tool of education to enlighten others as to
solution of the problem at hand.
Educating
the general public is an idea that the Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) has set out to do.In July
of 2000, the CDC added seven states, to make a total of twelve, "to the
campaign to reduce the number of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions."The
CDC's campaign is one in which billboards, TV and radio spots, bus stops,
and newspapers will be used as the vector to reach the general public.The
messages will most likely be ones of simple nature, so that the general
public, for example ones that have no biological background, will be able
to read and comprehend.[2]This
is a first step in the education process.By
putting this information out into the hands of the public it will create
it's own sense of awareness.Colorado
is one such state in which the CDC is starting their campaign.Coloradoans
are very keen on the idea; one mother says, "They [doctors] push antibiotics
way too much."[18]Colorado
will be allotted two million dollars of federal funds for this ad campaign.This
form of education is a general one, one in which the public will be able
to gain a general knowledge of the subject.This
is advantageous to get the ball rolling, so to speak.With
this groundwork laid, many patients own curiosity will get the better of
them and then the physicians will be primed to supplement the learning
process.
Giving
patients information through education during the visit is a crucial way
of education.This is the time in
which the patients can put their newfound knowledge to work.The
knowledge is applicable and relevant at the time, which aids in the learning
process.If educational material
is introduced at this time in the patient-physician relationship it is
more likely to be viewed as authoritative, reports say.[8]Verbal
instruction is not necessarily the easiest way for everyone to learn therefore
pamphlets and patient education sheets should be prepared and given out
at that time as well, so that the patient will be given the opportunity
to learn more about their situation.The
doctor would most likely make pamphlets and patient education sheets or
an organization well versed in the subject.These
supplemental education tools could be written with greater detail because
the patient for one will be with the doctor when he or she receives the
sheet and also the groundwork of CDC's ad campaign mentioned above will
have been laid.Having this form
of education tailored to each patient would be an ideal but highly improbable
way of going about it; however having narrower spectrum educational sheets
would be sufficient.Possibly with
these information sheets some long-term and short-term affects of reducing
antibiotic overuse should be stated.Some
long-term affects being mainly the decrease in the numbers of antibiotic
resistant bacterial strains.Short-term
effects include changing the amount of office visits and the type of therapy
used, ei. diet, herbs, lifestyle changes, etc.[8]
Education
at the level of elementary children would also be merited.Talking
with children at young ages, though not in a ground-shaking manner, could
introduce the idea and difference between viruses and bacterial infections.This
along with handing out information at places such as community organizations,
childcare centers, and pharmacies would be beneficial.Again
the whole idea behind this education is to repeat and reinforce, therefore
the more that the public sees and is made aware of the problem of antibiotic
overuse the more likely it is to stick with them.
The
physician must also gain education.Possibly
what the patient needs and/or wants is not always to have pills to take
care of their problem.Physicians
should be enlightened as to the newer and more foolproof testing methods
to insure the amount and correct antibiotic is administered.More
time should be taken with a patient, as alluded to before.By
taking the time in the office to explain and educate the patient as to
the illness that they are facing, and clearly laying out treatment options
is more advantageous to the patient and to the well being of the antibiotics.
Along
with education national guidelines for judicious antibiotic use would need
to be drawn up and then more importantly followed.Having
these guidelines set on a national level could cause predicaments and physicians
would be less likely to use those guidelines.[19]Most
commonly these guidelines are not followed because of there is a lack of
clinical applicability seen by the practicing physician.A
solution is to set very general guidelines at the national level and then
allow for a more local refinement of these general guidelines, therefore
the physicians would be more likely to follow guidelines that they had
set out.[20]Overall
the bureaucracy of these guidelines should not be so tight as to limit
the decision making process of the physician.
Upon
the advent of antibiotics Alexander Fleming warned that these antibiotics,
if misused could lead to grave problems, this warning was not heeded and
now the warning has come to pass.With
more and more bacterial strains gaining antibiotic resistance something
must be done.In a society based
around time and money it puts undesirable strains on doctors and physicians
to be rushed into prescribing medicine.This
in turn causes a gross over usage of antibiotics.Constant
overuse of antibiotics has been shown to lead to antibiotic resistant strains
of bacterial.Lack of education is
the leading causation in this problem.Therefore,
by educating the public as to reasoning behind prescribing is the way to
reduce the overuse of antibiotics.